Re: mo' betta notification?

David Glasser wrote:
> Mike, for the mo' betta merge, should there be a " U" notification on
> the root of the merge, for the mergeinfo change? There doesn't seem
> to be now (if the *only* change to mergeinfo is from the record-only
> merges).

My understanding was that we didn't print the ' U' when the propchanges made
were manufactured client-side. In other words, if the delta editor drive of
a merge modified the svn:mergeinfo property (or any other property), we'd
print the ' U' notification. But if it did not, and the only change to that
property was due to the client libraries fiddling with it post-merge, we'd
not print a notification.

Is that not the way things do -- and are intended to -- work?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand