[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Progress of extract and merge non-reflective changes from a reflective rev

From: Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-12-11 12:27:49 CET

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 8:13 PM, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> When we get the whole-branch-merge branch, and/or Mike's work, into a
>> state that handles the "safely merge back into trunk, handling mergeinfo"
>> use case, the priority of issue #2897 drops to the point where it is no
>> longer a 1.5 blocker. That said, it doesn't mean that we can't include
>> the fix for issue #2897 in 1.5 if it's completed in time.
> What about the idea of asking Kamesh to put the schema change and the
> code to populate it into a separate branch? I think we should
> consider including this in 1.5 even if we do not have any code that
> uses it as the information that it captures would probably be
> expensive to recreate later.

Created the branch 'record_exact_merge_and_commit_revs' to extract the
schema change from issue-2897 branch and relevant population bits of code.

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 11 12:27:27 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.