Re: Progress of extract and merge non-reflective changes from a reflective rev

On Dec 6, 2007 8:13 PM, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Mark Phippard wrote:

> When we get the whole-branch-merge branch, and/or Mike's work, into a
> state that handles the "safely merge back into trunk, handling mergeinfo"
> use case, the priority of issue #2897 drops to the point where it is no
> longer a 1.5 blocker. That said, it doesn't mean that we can't include
> the fix for issue #2897 in 1.5 if it's completed in time.

What about the idea of asking Kamesh to put the schema change and the
code to populate it into a separate branch? I think we should
consider including this in 1.5 even if we do not have any code that
uses it as the information that it captures would probably be
expensive to recreate later.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org