[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Progress of extract and merge non-reflective changes from a reflective rev

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-12-07 15:22:41 CET

On Dec 6, 2007 8:13 PM, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007, Mark Phippard wrote:

> When we get the whole-branch-merge branch, and/or Mike's work, into a
> state that handles the "safely merge back into trunk, handling mergeinfo"
> use case, the priority of issue #2897 drops to the point where it is no
> longer a 1.5 blocker. That said, it doesn't mean that we can't include
> the fix for issue #2897 in 1.5 if it's completed in time.

What about the idea of asking Kamesh to put the schema change and the
code to populate it into a separate branch? I think we should
consider including this in 1.5 even if we do not have any code that
uses it as the information that it captures would probably be
expensive to recreate later.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 7 15:22:57 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.