Re: bug in update -N hoses wc (issue #3039 )

On Dec 7, 2007 8:27 AM, Miller, Eric <Eric.Miller@amd.com> wrote:
> > Oh, and just to make sure: if we're doing an update at a depth that
> > should affect a directory A but ordinarily would not affect its
> > children (or its non-file children), and we get a delete for A, we
> > really should be doing a recursive delete anyway, right?
> >
> > (ie, the problem here is that the test cases fail, not that they fail
> > with an unintelligible error, right?)
>
> For me the biggest problem is that it results in a working copy that is
> unrecoverable using svn commands.

Oh, sure, that goes without saying :)

Thanks for the bug report, by the way! While in the future it would
be nice to clarify the version you're using, and to refrain from
opening a bug report without a buddy, this definitely is an issue we
should fix. (While it's not a regression from pre-1.5, that's only
because -N *never* really worked pre-1.5).

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org