[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: bug in update -N hoses wc (issue #3039 )

From: Miller, Eric <Eric.Miller_at_amd.com>
Date: 2007-12-07 17:27:40 CET

> Oh, and just to make sure: if we're doing an update at a depth that
> should affect a directory A but ordinarily would not affect its
> children (or its non-file children), and we get a delete for A, we
> really should be doing a recursive delete anyway, right?
> (ie, the problem here is that the test cases fail, not that they fail
> with an unintelligible error, right?)

For me the biggest problem is that it results in a working copy that is
unrecoverable using svn commands.

I don't really know what the correct action is - if a non-recursive
command is issued on something that *requires* recursion to be
successful do you ignore the command line and recurse or fail

I'll leave that decision to you guys :D


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 7 17:36:31 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.