[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Reality check

From: <philipp.marek_at_bmlv.gv.at>
Date: 2007-12-06 10:17:46 CET

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> I have similar feelings. In working on some of the auditing code, I've
> often thought "gee, if I could only tell if this copy is a branch or a
> true copy." Having branches in directory hierarchy is very useful,
> especially when browsing them using mod_dav_svn and my favorite web
> browser. But the extra branch v. copy metadata would be useful.
How about just defining some extra property, that should be set to define some
copy as a branch? Eg. "svn:branch-from" and some source
(repository-root-relative) path, and revision, like this:
  svn:branch-from = /trunk:521

That could be set for existing branches cheaply, and newer clients would do that
automatically - for a "svn branch" command, at least :-)



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 6 10:18:00 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.