[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Reality check

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-12-06 05:19:18 CET

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> IMNSHO, we should first support the mainstream CM paradigm, then worry
> about edge cases such as yours. Having the branch and directory
> namespaces conflated is sexy for small projects but horror on
> moderate-sized ones. And on large projects, you end up inventing branch
> namespace hierarchy where the tool doesn't support it.

I'm all for distinguishing formally between branches and copies, but
I'm not at all convinced it's problematic to have branches live in the
directory hierarchy. Kind of the opposite: I've liked it so far!

This may be because I lack some important bit of experience. If so,
and if you have that experience, Branko, please share...

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 6 05:19:30 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.