Re: svn commit: r28158 - in branches/issue-2897/subversion: include/private libsvn_fs_util libsvn_ra_neon libsvn_ra_serf libsvn_ra_svn mod_dav_svn mod_dav_svn/reports

Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> writes:
>> + ### Why are we returning an array of 'svn_merge_range_t' objects
>> + ### below, instead of just 'svn_revnum_t's? Isn't representing
>> + ### single revisions exactly what 'svn_revnum_t' is for? -Karl
>
> Currently we do so to ease the mergeinfo negation, we may go back to
> revlist once I have solid direction on non-reflective merge editor,
> which does not negate the reflective rev from the original merge.

I didn't quite understand that. What's a "non-reflective merge editor"?

>> + ### Might be better to write svn_rangelist_parse()? Could
>> + ### other places use it too? -Karl */
>>
>
> Yes!.

:-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 30 18:07:40 2007