Re: svn commit: r28158 - in branches/issue-2897/subversion: include/private libsvn_fs_util libsvn_ra_neon libsvn_ra_serf libsvn_ra_svn mod_dav_svn mod_dav_svn/reports

> + ### Why are we returning an array of 'svn_merge_range_t' objects
> + ### below, instead of just 'svn_revnum_t's? Isn't representing
> + ### single revisions exactly what 'svn_revnum_t' is for? -Karl
> +
>

Currently we do so to ease the mergeinfo negation, we may go back to
revlist once I have solid direction on non-reflective merge editor,
which does not negate the reflective rev from the original merge.

> +
> + ### Might be better to write svn_rangelist_parse()? Could
> + ### other places use it too? -Karl */
>

Yes!.

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 30 08:02:34 2007