[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Releasing 1.4.6 [was Re: svn commit: r27983 - branches/1.4.x]

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: 2007-11-23 02:11:43 CET

On Nov 22, 2007 8:08 PM, David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net> wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2007 7:34 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > glasser@tigris.org wrote:
> > > Author: glasser
> > > Date: Thu Nov 22 14:46:08 2007
> > > New Revision: 27983
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > STATUS: Yet another reason you should vote for r27256.
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > > branches/1.4.x/STATUS
> > >
> > > Modified: branches/1.4.x/STATUS
> > > URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/branches/1.4.x/STATUS?pathrev=27983&r1=27982&r2=27983
> > > ==============================================================================
> > > --- branches/1.4.x/STATUS (original)
> > > +++ branches/1.4.x/STATUS Thu Nov 22 14:46:08 2007
> > > @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
> > > from any changes in the txn, they won't commit.
> > > * I suspect that this is the cause of an FSFS corruption
> > > observed during performance testing by Dan Christian.
> > > + * Fixes a serious user-reported corruption problem with
> > > + commits over mod_dav_svn:
> > > + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2007-11/0964.shtml
> > > Votes:
> > > +1: glasser, hwright
> >
> > IIRC, we've had a few data corruption fixes go into 1.4.x since we
> > released 1.4.4 at the beginning of June (almost 6 months ago!). I would
> > like to propose a review of STATUS and a release of 1.4.6 by the end of
> > next week.
> >
> > Last time we discussed the subject (see
> > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2007-10/0146.shtml), people wanted to
> > wait until 1.5 branched. That has been longer in coming than
> > anticipated, and I think we owe it to our users to get these fixes out
> > the door. Plus, prepping 1.4.6 would get people's test environments in
> > shape for 1.5.0-rc1 :)
> >
> > Would a target date of Nov. 30 be unreasonable?
>
> +1. I did a review of STATUS a few weeks ago for just this reason.

I also did a pass through CHANGES for 1.4.6, though we've ported a
thing or two since then.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 23 02:11:53 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.