Re: Copy/move-handling on update in 1.5

[Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman <at> red-bean.com>]
> Sure, we have several test cases that demonstrate it working. :-)

I had a look at the two most relevant tests (37 and 39), and both of
them do copy, not move.

I have no problem producing examples where local modifications are
correctly handled on an incoming copy. I guess copy should always work
well (no dependency on semi-random ordering, etc)?

So the bottom line still seems to be that nobody has ever seen a
scenario similar to that described in the release note, that is,
involving a move, where the local changes are handled correctly...

(Nice poem on r26957, by the way :)

- Tor -

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 15 18:54:50 2007