On 11/15/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 8:58 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 11/15/07, Freddie Albertsman <c03fan@cs.umu.se> wrote:
> > > Hi Tor!
> > >
> > > I'm working on the copy-on-update problem; it works actually when the delete
> > > happens after the add. I'm working on a solution that would always make the
> > > delete happens at the very end.
> > >
> > > I haven't come across any example either that makes the scenario you
> > > presented (copy on update) behave normally.
> >
> > If I'm correct, deletes are inherently sent before adds because we had
> > problems with case-sensitivity before: if a file is renamed from
> > THIS-FILE to this-file and the Add is sent before the delete, Windows
> > gets confused (heavily). To resolve this problem, Adds are sent before
> > Deletes, afaik.
>
> That is also what I thought ... except I think you meant to say
> Deletes are sent before Adds.
Heh. ofcourse I meant to say that.
bye,
Erik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 15 15:18:53 2007