Re: Copy/move-handling on update in 1.5

On Nov 15, 2007 8:58 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/15/07, Freddie Albertsman <c03fan@cs.umu.se> wrote:
> > Hi Tor!
> >
> > I'm working on the copy-on-update problem; it works actually when the delete
> > happens after the add. I'm working on a solution that would always make the
> > delete happens at the very end.
> >
> > I haven't come across any example either that makes the scenario you
> > presented (copy on update) behave normally.
>
> If I'm correct, deletes are inherently sent before adds because we had
> problems with case-sensitivity before: if a file is renamed from
> THIS-FILE to this-file and the Add is sent before the delete, Windows
> gets confused (heavily). To resolve this problem, Adds are sent before
> Deletes, afaik.

That is also what I thought ... except I think you meant to say
Deletes are sent before Adds.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org