Re: Interactively postpone all remaining conflicts?

Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:
> Until we can more gracefully support the case where a merge conflict
> occurs before the final pass of a multi-pass 'merge' operation, I
> hesitate to offer this feature for 'merge'. And while it might be
> convenient now if we could determine that a merge required only a
> single pass (using a callback from the cmdline-client into
> libsvn_client), this would result in a UI inconsistency.

Given this, I agree -- let's not try for it in 1.5. If people really
want it, we'll hear about it, and maybe we'll feel differently about
automatic continuation in multi-pass merges even over conflicts by
then. (Don't ask me why, we just might.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 7 02:13:35 2007