[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue #2991 resolved, but questions remain.

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-11-07 02:10:48 CET

"Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman@red-bean.com> writes:
> I missed the backstory here: it turns out that OPTIONS wasn't usable
> for feature negotiation? I mean, that's what the WebDAV and DeltaV
> specs say it's for. Did you end up using custom headers due to a neon
> limitation?

I had some concerns about connection boundaries in ra_dav, but in
retrospect, they're silly. I don't know what I was thinking. I'll
try moving this to a single OPTIONS request (namely, the one we
already use to discover the server's capabilities) and if the
capabilities stay set, then we're golden.

Thanks for the review!


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 7 02:11:01 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.