[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue #2991 resolved, but questions remain.

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-11-06 09:41:12 CET

"David Glasser" <glasser@davidglasser.net> writes:
>> You can imagine why: it's largely an accident of implementation
>> and the fact that ra_svn was already transmitting capabilities
>> before the other RA layers got into the game.
> Well, sort of. It's also the fact that some of these (edit-pipeline
> especially, and svndiff1 to some degree) are really ra_svn-protocol
> specific. They aren't properties of the *Subversion* client or server
> (like the new caps are); they're properties of the *ra_svn protocol*
> client or server. I don't think that start-commit should see them any
> more than they should see User-Agent strings or whether mod_gzip was
> used or something.

Ah, I wasn't sure that was the case with 'absent-entries', but on
further thought you're right, they're protocol capabilities not
Subversion capabilities.

So, I'll filter them out. (Tomorrow :-) ).


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 6 09:41:22 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.