[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue #2991 resolved, but questions remain.

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: 2007-11-06 09:24:29 CET

On 11/6/07, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:

> 3) RA-dependent inconsistency in capability reporting.
> This is a minor nit, sort of related to (2). Both ra_local and
> ra_dav (neon and serf) pass the same set of capabilities to
> 'start-commit', namely "log-revprops,depth,mergeinfo" (the order
> might change, but the set is the same). However, ra_svn sends:
> "edit-pipeline,svndiff1,absent-entries,depth,mergeinfo,log-revprops"
> You can imagine why: it's largely an accident of implementation
> and the fact that ra_svn was already transmitting capabilities
> before the other RA layers got into the game.

Well, sort of. It's also the fact that some of these (edit-pipeline
especially, and svndiff1 to some degree) are really ra_svn-protocol
specific. They aren't properties of the *Subversion* client or server
(like the new caps are); they're properties of the *ra_svn protocol*
client or server. I don't think that start-commit should see them any
more than they should see User-Agent strings or whether mod_gzip was
used or something.


David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 6 09:24:38 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.