[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Problems with property conflict callback

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-30 22:46:34 CET

Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>> On 10/29/07, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>>>> On 10/29/07, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> FWIW, I only test with merge too. Because for updates, I just let the
>>>>> conflict happen.
>>>>> Imagine someone doing a lengthy update, goes for a coffee until the
>>>>> update is finished. He returns, and finds that the update was stalled
>>>>> due to the conflict callback asking for user input.
>>>>> For the user, it doesn't make much of a difference whether he has to
>>>>> resolve the conflicts at the end of the update or in between - the
>>>>> conflicts are the same.
>>>>> Only for merges it's important to resolve the conflicts right away,
>>>>> because otherwise further merges could fail.
>>>> Is this a configurable thing? I'd like to always be prompted during an update.
>>> You mean in TSVN?
>>> No, at least not right now, and it's not planned (yet). We've discussed
>>> this a little on the mailing list, but people either didn't wanted to be
>>> prompted at all during an update or they didn't care.
>>> You can doubleclick on the red marked entries (the conflicts) in the
>>> progress dialog after an update to resolve the conflicts. And TMerge
>>> even has a button to mark the conflict as resolved (as you can do by
>>> right-clicking on such a red conflicted entry from the context menu).
>>> Why do you want to be prompted for every possible conflict *during* an
>>> update and not just at the end of the update? If you could explain so I
>>> can understand your reasons, I might add a configuration for this.
>> Ah, didn't realize I could still resolve at the end of the update...
>> if it's the same dialog box, then to me it still feels like 'during'
>> the update. That's totally fine.
> Are the new 'svn resolved --accept=ARG' options support (e.g. 'base', 'mine',
> 'theirs')?

Those are even available in TSVN 1.4.x (we've implemented those on our
own before SVN 1.5 did).


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 30 22:46:56 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.