I don't think it's a deliberate thing, nor would it be hard to do.
But you haven't told us why we should bother. :). Are we violating
some spec?
On 10/26/07, Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> wrote:
> I asked this question over on the user list, and got directed here.
>
> This is certainly a minor issue, if it even is one.
>
> My company has Subversion set up using Apache. If I use an HTTP GET on a
> file, there is no Content-MD5 header in the response, even though using
> the command-line cadaver client, I can do a "propget" request on the
> file, and there is a md5-checksum property for that same resource. It
> seems to me that if the data is available, SVN ought to provide it, but
> maybe this is difficult to do?
>
> Should I file an issue for this? Is this by design?
>
> -Eric.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 27 02:40:50 2007