"Miller, Eric" <Eric.Miller@amd.com> writes:
> I am making progress but ran into a snag.
>
> Basically I attempted to call svn_wc_crawl_revisions2() iteratively for
> each target in the update set without creating a new ra session. The
> problem is that the crawler drives the reporter and then calls
> finish_report().
>
> I'm not sure how to proceed now... I suppose I could make a new crawler
> that took an array of path strings and then called the finish_report
> when done, but that would mean modifying adm_crawler.c instead of just
> putzing around with the APIs (and so far just the perl bindings at
> that!)
I apologize that I can't help further right now. I'm very busy with
trying to get the 1.5 release out the door (as are many others), and
the 24-hours-in-a-day limit is unfortunately the bottleneck here. I'm
not saying that to discourage you from working on this, though -- it
would be great to get this problem solved.
Did you first profile to confirm that session-opening overhead is
where the extra time is coming from, by the way?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 27 01:58:12 2007