> "Miller, Eric" <Eric.Miller@amd.com> writes:
> > Unfortunately there went my easy out. Do you think it would be
possible
> > to drive a partial tree update with a single ra session? I'm
assuming
> > opening and closing this session is what is the most time consuming.
>
> I'm not sure that assumption is correct (also not sure it isn't).
>
> I don't see why it would be impossible, as long as the root of the
> session is "high up" enough to cover every path involved. I'm not
> sure it's the solution, but it's worth looking at.
I am making progress but ran into a snag.
Basically I attempted to call svn_wc_crawl_revisions2() iteratively for
each target in the update set without creating a new ra session. The
problem is that the crawler drives the reporter and then calls
finish_report().
I'm not sure how to proceed now... I suppose I could make a new crawler
that took an array of path strings and then called the finish_report
when done, but that would mean modifying adm_crawler.c instead of just
putzing around with the APIs (and so far just the perl bindings at
that!)
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 27 01:16:41 2007