On 10/11/07, David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd also be opposed to this patch unless we are going to implement
> > better (actually we don't have any exposed in JavaHL) API's for
> > working with the configuration files. I am kind of stuck when dealing
> > with these issues in Subclipse because I do not have any way to
> > examine or update the configuration other than going at the files
> > directly. Given that Subclipse is platform independent and the rules
> > for the configuration files are not, this is not trivial.
>
> I agree these are major issues, but does Subclipse not have to
> specifically load the config with the JavaHL equivalent of
> svn_config_get_config and load it into the client context like the C
> code does? Because JavaHL could just override the appropriate hash
> value based on its own config...
That all happens inside JavaHL and it does not expose an option that
allows us to push in a configuration. We can give it the equivalent
of the --config-dir argument but that is it. There is an open issue
to do this. We'd also want one that let us read in the configuration,
which took into account things like the Windows registry.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 11 18:06:58 2007