[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SWIG versions - why not 1.3.31 yet?

From: David Summers <david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us>
Date: 2007-09-29 17:58:27 CEST

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> On 9/27/07, Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> wrote:
>
>> Users of enterprise, slow-update-cycle, distros should be using
>> Subversion release tarballs, not svn checkouts, and thereby be unaffected.
>
> To be utterly clear: from the user's point of view, there is no
> compile-time or run-time dependency on any particular version of swig.
> The svn release tarball ships with bindings that are
> ready-to-compile, with no external dependencies.
>
> So it's irrelevant what version of swig happens to ship in any
> particular linux distro. The *only* people who need a certain version
> of swig available are svn developers building from a working copy.
>

OK, that makes sense. Thanks.

David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = 0B44 B118 85CC F4EC 7021 1ED4 1516 5B78 E320 2001

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 29 17:07:02 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.