[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Perforce comparison

From: Daniel L. Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-09-27 06:23:41 CEST

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Garrett Rooney wrote:

> On 9/26/07, Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > I think their "distributed development" row (which is actually just
> > about slow network links) kind of inverts the story. My muddled
> > understanding is that Perforce is much more dependent upon a fast
> > network link because you typically NFS-mount your working copy.
>
> Actually it's more the fact that you have to contact the server for
> almost all actions, you don't actually NFS mount your working copy in
> p4 (perhaps you're thinking of clearcase?).

...because all p4 WC meta data is stored server-side; only the equivalent
of Subversion's text-base is stored client-side.

-- 
Daniel Rall

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Thu Sep 27 06:24:12 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.