Re: Bindings question: do keyword args make us name-sensitive?

"Garrett Rooney" <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> FWIW, we have had various things in the SWIG bindings break as a
> result of that kind of change in the past (I know, I'm the one who
> broke them ;-), although it's usually the kind of thing where all of a
> sudden some type mappings stop working, someone notices and fixes the
> mappings. I don't think we've ever made any conscious decision to
> support parameter names as some sort of firm API though, although I
> could be mistaken there.

Breaking the bindings is acceptable (though inconvenient), since they
can just be fixed. Breaking the bindings *API* would be the problem...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 12 09:21:48 2007