Re: Bindings question: do keyword args make us name-sensitive?

"Sage La Torra" <sagelt@gmail.com> writes:
> I'll have to look into this, but as far as I know, ctypes does not
> support automatically making keyword arguments. At present the
> high-level classes built to make the binding extra nice do have
> keyword arguments, but they are human generated.

It sounds like the answer is: we probably shouldn't do this again, but
it was okay to do it this time, since it happens that no bindings
actually autogenerate keyword arguments yet.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 12 02:33:45 2007