[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: --pre-1.X-compatible and fsfs transaction counter

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-07-30 14:38:51 CEST

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:56:27PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> BTW, I think the BDB transaction names do not include the revision number in
> the transaction name. Should we make BDB use the same format
> <rev>-<base36-number> as the new fsfs transaction names for consistency?

Actually, the fact that the transaction numbers are distinctly different
has been quite helpful in some cases, because it means that you can
identify the filesystem from the error message. (I'm thinking mostly of
user reports that say "I got this error message when I'm running an FSFS
repository on NFS", and it's clearly a BDB transaction id).


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Jul 30 14:40:42 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.