[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion, decentralized version control, and the future.

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-07-19 07:08:21 CEST

Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
> One thing Raymond didn't touch on was the _reason_ people stayed with
> CVS, in spite of all of its flaws: you could trust it not to break
> your data. And here I mean break the data by itself, not through
> misuse.
> And _that_ is where I see subversion as the only free CVS replacement
> candidate: subversion can be trusted not to break your data.
> I can't say I have the same feeling about the rest. Distributed or
> not becomes a secondary issue.

I haven't heard of data-loss problems with any of the other systems.
(I do know people who use Mercurial, GIT, and SVK on a regular basis.)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 19 07:07:36 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.