[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Build Error when compiling python binding on Windows with VC6 at r25159 or later

From: masaru tsuchiyama <m.tmatma_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-07-10 15:50:57 CEST

Hello

> > Masaru, can you test this out for us? If it works, David's suggestion
> > sounds like a better general approach.

> In the Ruby bindings, I see that you used "%clear long long" to clear
> out the old SWIG typemaps. Does this work in the Python bindings? If
> so, perhaps we should get rid of this hack to python.swg altogether
> and just use %clear long long and/or %clear unsigned long long.

Does anybody make a patch to implement David's suggestion?

Regards.
Masaru

2007/6/1, masaru tsuchiyama <m.tmatma@gmail.com>:
> > Masaru, can you test this out for us? If it works, David's suggestion
> > sounds like a better general approach.
> Sorry. I don't understand SWIG syntax.
> So could you make it as a patch?
>
> Regards.
> Masaru.
>
>
> 2007/6/1, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net>:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2007, David James wrote:
> >
> > > On 5/28/07, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >Hi
> > > >
> > > >On 5/27/07, Masaru Tsuchiyama <m.tmatma@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Hi
> > > >>
> > > >> > I'm no expert, but it sounds like it may be a SWIG version issue? I
> > > >> > had a lot of long long issues building the Ruby bindings with a SWIG
> > > >> > versions later than 1.3.24.
> > > >> I'm using swig 1.3.31. It is not Ruby bindings but Python bindings
> > > >> what I mention.
> > > >>
> > > >I understood, I was just mentioning I got the same error when I first
> > > >started
> > > >trying to get the Ruby bindings to build.
> > > >
> > > >> r25158 is the revision at which merge-sensitive-log branch was merged.
> > > >> I think it breaks building python bindings.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >apr_uint64_t is now used in the Subversion headers. The patch below fixes
> > > >the
> > > >build errors for me, but the tests don't pass.
> > >
> > > Hi Joe,
> > >
> > > In the Ruby bindings, I see that you used "%clear long long" to clear
> > > out the old SWIG typemaps. Does this work in the Python bindings? If
> > > so, perhaps we should get rid of this hack to python.swg altogether
> > > and just use %clear long long and/or %clear unsigned long long.
> >
> > Masaru, can you test this out for us? If it works, David's suggestion
> > sounds like a better general approach.
> >
> > - Dan
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 10 15:50:30 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.