Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, D.J. Heap wrote:
>
>> On 7/9/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Are we sure this is even the problem? 10 milliseconds is a pretty
>>> small window. Could the test be changed to sleep for 10 milliseconds
>>> to prove this is it?
>>
>> I don't know why APR isn't using the high-resolution timers on
>> Windows, but Ivan's explanation matches the behavior I'm seeing. To
>> test it out, I added a Sleep(100) call to the failing tests where-ever
>> they were creating new revs/txns and the tests consistently pass now.
>
> Adding a serial transaction number to FSFS seems like a higher
> priority than digging into this, since it should really be added
> regardless. I'd rather see time spent implementing it...
Which is what I will do, when I get some cycles :)
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 10 03:34:29 2007