Re: [PATCH] Build both serf and dav

On 6/18/07, Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:
> Seems a bit awkward to talk about 'http-library' with values of 'dav'
> or 'serf', since both libraries use DAV. It would make more sense to
> me if the configuration interface called the two values 'neon' and
> 'serf'.
>
> (I do know why libsvn_ra_dav is called that, and I suppose it wouldn't
> be reasonable to actually rename it, since some client programs may be
> dynamically linked to it even though they don't (directly) use it,
> thanks to libtool's penchant for exaggeration.)

I did think about that a little. What do other people think?

> Regardless, thanks for making it possible to link both backends in.

Sure thing. (Are you planning to make Debian's 1.5 package link both?)

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org