On Wed, 23 May 2007, Karl Fogel wrote:
> "Jeremy Whitlock" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Before someone else takes this and runs with it, I would like to
> > work on this. I'll look into the source to formulate a plan and then
> > I will send this to you all for review before working on any code.
> > How does this sound?
> Typical way to do this is to go into the tracker and assign the issue
> to yourself, mark it as "STARTED", and then go to work.
> This is a small enough change that I don't think you need to wait
> before starting to work on the code. It's fine to send an overview of
> your plan here, of course, but don't get too hung up on waiting for
> feedback -- anyway, going down the wrong path would be educational, so
> it's not like you can waste time.
Jeremy and I were just discussing how to get started writing a test.
I suggested that he refactor the conflict creation code housed in the
basic_conflict() routine in subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.py
into a helper function, and add a new test to exercise 'resolved
--accept=WHICH' to either basic_tests.py or merge_tests.py, using the
new helper routine.
Received on Wed May 23 18:58:33 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored