[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: MT 'blame' and 'log' Auditing - Design Specification

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-05-01 01:03:10 CEST

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > I still do not agree with this part of the spec:
> >
> > svn blame
> > Two additional columns for each line, with the original revision
> > and author of that line. Unlike other commands, we do not need to
> > worry about multiple source revisions, because each line can have at
> > most one author.
> >
> >
> > I object to the two additional columns. If I run svn blame
> > --merge-sensitive I do not need to see any other information. I
> > thought at one point we even said that were it not for the expected
> > performance hit in getting the merge information that svn blame should
> > just always return this information. When using blame it is not
> > likely that someone would want any other information.
> I agree. I was surprised to see that still in the spec.
> The comments made elsethread about returning both sets of data through
> the blame API express a valid concern. This should be fairly easy to
> accommodate; the command-line client can just filter this output, while
> other clients can cache it or hide it pending a checkbox or whatever
> else they please.

These extra columns were removed from the func spec. The API will
still provide "actual" and "original" revnum and author -- this will
be noted in the design spec.

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue May 1 01:03:59 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.