Vlad Georgescu wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>
>> vgeorgescu@tigris.org wrote:
>>
>>> + # Update at depth=immediates in the other wc, expecting to see no errors.
>>> + svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svn("Output on stderr where none expected",
>>> + SVNAnyOutput, [],
>>> + 'update', '--depth', 'immediates',
>>> + other_wc)
>>> +
>>>
>> Vlad,
>>
>> I think this test would be (even) better if you actually checked the
>> output of update, it's supposed to receive the property changes on A right?
>>
>
> Yes, but the last update fails because of an error:
>
> Output on stderr where none expected
> EXPECTED STDERR:
> ACTUAL STDERR:
> ../svn-trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/lock.c:989: (apr_err=155005)
> svn: Unable to lock 'svn-test-work/working_copies/depth_tests-18.other/A'
> EXCEPTION: SVNLineUnequal
>
> If I change the test to use expected_output, will it still display
> the error, or will it just complain about the trees being unequal?
>
Hm, had to check that. In svntest/actions.py the run_and_verify_update
function first matches the error and only then starts comparing the trees.
Lieven
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 30 22:43:36 2007