Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> vgeorgescu@tigris.org wrote:
>> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +def depth_immediates_subdir_propset_2(sbox):
>> + "depth-1 update receives a subdirectory propset"
>> + sbox.build()
>> + wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir
>> +
>> + # Make the other working copy.
>> + other_wc = sbox.add_wc_path('other')
>> + svntest.actions.duplicate_dir(wc_dir, other_wc)
>> +
>> + A_path = os.path.join(wc_dir, 'A')
>> +
>> + # Set a property on an immediate subdirectory of the working copy.
>> + svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svn(None, None, [],
>> + 'pset', 'foo', 'bar',
>> + A_path)
>> + # Commit.
>> + svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svn(None, None, [],
>> + 'commit', '-m', 'logmsg', A_path)
>> +
>> + # Update at depth=immediates in the other wc, expecting to see no errors.
>> + svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svn("Output on stderr where none expected",
>> + SVNAnyOutput, [],
>> + 'update', '--depth', 'immediates',
>> + other_wc)
>> +
> Vlad,
>
> I think this test would be (even) better if you actually checked the
> output of update, it's supposed to receive the property changes on A right?
Yes, but the last update fails because of an error:
Output on stderr where none expected
EXPECTED STDERR:
ACTUAL STDERR:
../svn-trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/lock.c:989: (apr_err=155005)
svn: Unable to lock 'svn-test-work/working_copies/depth_tests-18.other/A'
EXCEPTION: SVNLineUnequal
If I change the test to use expected_output, will it still display
the error, or will it just complain about the trees being unequal?
--
Vlad
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 30 22:38:57 2007