Re: MT 'blame' and 'log' Auditing - Design Specification

On 4/28/07, Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com> wrote:
> On 28/04/2007 17.21, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > I object to the two additional columns. If I run svn blame
> > --merge-sensitive I do not need to see any other information. I
> > thought at one point we even said that were it not for the expected
> > performance hit in getting the merge information that svn blame should
> > just always return this information. When using blame it is not
> > likely that someone would want any other information.
>
> +1 here. And I still don't agree for it not being the default. I still wonder
> who exactly worries about svn blame's performance (especially when compared
> with correctness).

I believe blame performance is a huge issue to the gcc and kde
developers. dannyb made a lot of improvements to the performance so
that those projects could switch to svn.

dlr things that the performance hit here could be pretty substantial.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org