Re: MT 'blame' and 'log' Auditing - Design Specification

On 28/04/2007 17.21, Mark Phippard wrote:

> I object to the two additional columns. If I run svn blame
> --merge-sensitive I do not need to see any other information. I
> thought at one point we even said that were it not for the expected
> performance hit in getting the merge information that svn blame should
> just always return this information. When using blame it is not
> likely that someone would want any other information.

+1 here. And I still don't agree for it not being the default. I still wonder
who exactly worries about svn blame's performance (especially when compared
with correctness).

-- 
Giovanni Bajo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org