[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-04-27 23:19:05 CEST

On 4/27/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > I can pretty easily do the list-of-extensions-to-preserve thing (small
> > change from where my patch already sits).
> But of course, "small changes" are never so.
> You see, there's a problem with list-of-extensions-to-preserve -- there's no
> way to say "all of them".
> So I started toward list-of-extension-patterns-to-preserve:
> do[ct] - Word docs and templates
> od? - OpenOffice documents
> ...
> But that might be confusing to folks since the global-ignores is file
> patterns, whereas this is just file extension patterns. So do I want
> list-of-file-patterns-for-which-to-preserve-extensions?
> *.do[ct]
> *.od?

Sorry, I cannot say that I have a strong opinion. I'd be fine with
either approach.

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 27 23:19:23 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.