[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-04-27 22:45:23 CEST

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I can pretty easily do the list-of-extensions-to-preserve thing (small
> change from where my patch already sits).

But of course, "small changes" are never so.

You see, there's a problem with list-of-extensions-to-preserve -- there's no
way to say "all of them".

So I started toward list-of-extension-patterns-to-preserve:

   do[ct] - Word docs and templates
   od? - OpenOffice documents
   ...

But that might be confusing to folks since the global-ignores is file
patterns, whereas this is just file extension patterns. So do I want
list-of-file-patterns-for-which-to-preserve-extensions?

   *.do[ct]
   *.od?
   ...

(You may all issue a collective "Good grief..." now.)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Fri Apr 27 22:45:33 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.