Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations
Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>>> On 4/25/07, Daniel Rall <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>> As a result, I think the new conflict filename behaviour should be
>>>>>> deactivated by default.
>>>>> Yeah, or removed entirely.
>>>> (I think the new scheme is far far worse than what we had before.)
>>> Yeah, those are bad side-effects. I'm not emotionally tied to the new
>>> scheme -- I just banged the code out. I'll revert the change(s) at first
>>> real opportunity. But if someone else wants to jump on the task sooner,
>>> just speak up and go for it.
>> Actually, I've changed my mind. I'm going to add this as a runtime
>> configuration option: conflict_files_keep_extension
Yeah, I like preserve better, too. Was just trying to keep a single option
name from wrapping in my editor. :-) I'll use 'preserve'.
C. Michael Pilato <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Thu Apr 26 19:12:39 2007
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev