Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >> On 4/25/07, Daniel Rall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >>>> As a result, I think the new conflict filename behaviour should be
> >>>> deactivated by default.
> >>> Yeah, or removed entirely.
> >> +1.
> >> (I think the new scheme is far far worse than what we had before.)
> > Yeah, those are bad side-effects. I'm not emotionally tied to the new
> > scheme -- I just banged the code out. I'll revert the change(s) at first
> > real opportunity. But if someone else wants to jump on the task sooner,
> > just speak up and go for it.
> Actually, I've changed my mind. I'm going to add this as a runtime
> configuration option: conflict_files_keep_extension
Received on Thu Apr 26 18:46:06 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev