[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merge Tracking Auditing - SoC

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-04-23 21:02:33 CEST

On 4/23/07, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > Hello all.
> >
> > As many of you know, the approval for Summer of Code projects came last
> > week, and I've received funding to work on the auditing aspect of merge
> > tracking
> > (http://subversion.tigris.org/merge-tracking/func-spec.html#commutative-author-and-rev).
> > I'm excited to get going on the project.
> >
> > Over the next month, I'd like to finalize the functional spec at the
> > above URL. I would appreciate it if people could take a look at it and
> > suggest any changes. The pending questions in the spec, with varying
> > degrees of relevancy, are:
> >
> > * How will --merge-sensitive behave for commits which remove merge info
> > (e.g. reverts)?
> >
> > * In the case of svn log, would the user be better served if we just
> > included the original revision logs in line with the logs (i.e., no
> > special indentation, etc.)?
> >
> > * What about svn ls --verbose, which also shows revisions and usernames?
>
> We've resolved these questions, but added one more:
> * What happens when svn status --show-updates has multiple original
> authors?

I think it should be handled the same as info and ls, which I believe
means no changes to current behavior.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 23 21:02:41 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.