Re: Merge Tracking Auditing - SoC
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Hello all.
> As many of you know, the approval for Summer of Code projects came last
> week, and I've received funding to work on the auditing aspect of merge
> I'm excited to get going on the project.
> Over the next month, I'd like to finalize the functional spec at the
> above URL. I would appreciate it if people could take a look at it and
> suggest any changes. The pending questions in the spec, with varying
> degrees of relevancy, are:
> * How will --merge-sensitive behave for commits which remove merge info
> (e.g. reverts)?
> * In the case of svn log, would the user be better served if we just
> included the original revision logs in line with the logs (i.e., no
> special indentation, etc.)?
> * What about svn ls --verbose, which also shows revisions and usernames?
We've resolved these questions, but added one more:
* What happens when svn status --show-updates has multiple original
Received on Mon Apr 23 20:47:36 2007
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev