[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merge Tracking Auditing - SoC

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: 2007-04-23 20:47:25 CEST

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Hello all.
> As many of you know, the approval for Summer of Code projects came last
> week, and I've received funding to work on the auditing aspect of merge
> tracking
> (http://subversion.tigris.org/merge-tracking/func-spec.html#commutative-author-and-rev).
> I'm excited to get going on the project.
> Over the next month, I'd like to finalize the functional spec at the
> above URL. I would appreciate it if people could take a look at it and
> suggest any changes. The pending questions in the spec, with varying
> degrees of relevancy, are:
> * How will --merge-sensitive behave for commits which remove merge info
> (e.g. reverts)?
> * In the case of svn log, would the user be better served if we just
> included the original revision logs in line with the logs (i.e., no
> special indentation, etc.)?
> * What about svn ls --verbose, which also shows revisions and usernames?

We've resolved these questions, but added one more:
* What happens when svn status --show-updates has multiple original

Any thoughts?


Received on Mon Apr 23 20:47:36 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.