Hi
On 4/13/07, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi kou,
>
> On 4/12/07, Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > 2007/4/12, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Sure. One question, why do you prefer using "long long" in the
> > > typemaps instead of "apr_int64_t" or "apr_time_t?"
> >
> > * We just want to re-define "long long" typemaps not "apr_int64_t"
> > and "apr_time_t".
> > * There is information that "apr_int64_t" and "apr_time_t" equal
> > "long long" in apr.i. I don't write same information in different places.
> >
> > They are the reason.
> >
> >
>
> I haven't forgotten, but your comments have me looking in some dark
> corners. While this patch has the distinct advantage of working,
> somehow it doesn't feel quite right. I want to fiddle around with
> some ideas just a little, if I don't come up with something I like
> better I'll commit this patch early next week.
>
I reallly tried to find a way to define apr_int64_t directly, without
any reference
to long long as this seems like part of what we are trying to do with APR in the
first place. But it beat me. I committed the svn_globals.swg changes
in r24626.
Moving on.
--
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 18 07:21:58 2007