Re: [patch] Building the Ruby bindings on windows with SWIG > 1.3.24

Hi kou,

On 4/12/07, Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> 2007/4/12, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com>:
>
> > Sure. One question, why do you prefer using "long long" in the
> > typemaps instead of "apr_int64_t" or "apr_time_t?"
>
> * We just want to re-define "long long" typemaps not "apr_int64_t"
> and "apr_time_t".
> * There is information that "apr_int64_t" and "apr_time_t" equal
> "long long" in apr.i. I don't write same information in different places.
>
> They are the reason.
>
>

I haven't forgotten, but your comments have me looking in some dark
corners. While this patch has the distinct advantage of working,
somehow it doesn't feel quite right. I want to fiddle around with
some ideas just a little, if I don't come up with something I like
better I'll commit this patch early next week.

Thanks for your patience,

--
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org