Re: [PATCH] Don't waste some APR file buffers
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> Daniel Rall <email@example.com> writes:
> > +1, this patch does what's intended. We're sure there's no unexpected
> > side-effects from this?
> We're sure it passes the tests. I obviously can't say with
> certainty that there are no unexpected side effects, but all
> we're doing is dropping the buffer, which is just an optimization
> to reduce the number of reads and writes. It's actually a
> de-optimization (mediocritization? :) for files as tiny as these.
Right. Commit it.
Received on Tue Apr 17 01:42:31 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev