[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is mod_dav_svn safe for use in a threaded MPM?

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-04-05 20:27:03 CEST

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> > This has always bothered me, too.
> >
> > But let me back a little more out of the box and ask -- is there any
> > particular reason why we need the activities table at all? I mean, if al=
> > l
> > it provides is a mapping of "DAV activity" to "Subversion txn" why can't =
> > we
> > just use the Subversion txn name in the WebDAV protocol?
> I thought the client picked the activity name, and used it in a
> MKACTIVITY request?

That's my understanding too, hence why we need some kind of mapping in
the first place.


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Thu Apr 5 20:28:17 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.