Re: Is mod_dav_svn safe for use in a threaded MPM?
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" <email@example.com> writes:
> > This has always bothered me, too.
> > But let me back a little more out of the box and ask -- is there any
> > particular reason why we need the activities table at all? I mean, if al=
> > l
> > it provides is a mapping of "DAV activity" to "Subversion txn" why can't =
> > we
> > just use the Subversion txn name in the WebDAV protocol?
> I thought the client picked the activity name, and used it in a
> MKACTIVITY request?
That's my understanding too, hence why we need some kind of mapping in
the first place.
Received on Thu Apr 5 20:28:17 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev