Re: Is mod_dav_svn safe for use in a threaded MPM?

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:

> This has always bothered me, too.
>
> But let me back a little more out of the box and ask -- is there any
> particular reason why we need the activities table at all? I mean, if al=
> l
> it provides is a mapping of "DAV activity" to "Subversion txn" why can't =
> we
> just use the Subversion txn name in the WebDAV protocol?

I thought the client picked the activity name, and used it in a
MKACTIVITY request?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 5 20:15:39 2007