Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Malcolm Rowe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 11:16:20AM +0100, Simon Young wrote:
>> > The bug: If you svndump using the -deltas switch, the resultant dump
>> > be processed by svndumpfilter
>> This isn't so much a bug as a missing feature - svndumpfilter doesn't
>> know how to parse dumpfiles containing deltas.
>> I've filed issue #2760 to cover this.
> I'm not sure this isn't intentional: what if part of the history of a
> file was filtered out? How do you reconstruct its contents?
I'm pretty sure it *was* intentional. But when I thought more about this,
I'm not sure it was necessary.
Delta chains are generated for line of history -- a line that's extended
only via edits and copies. svndumpfilter is a path-based filter only,
meaning it can only possibly break a line of history if that line changes
paths (crossing into the excluded paths region). But even when not in
--deltas mode, svndumpfilter can only correctly handle such an action when
the copied thing was a file that happened to be modified in the same
revision in which it was copied.
So, I think we could actually relax this a little bit and grow support for
the new format (to the extent it can be supported).
C. Michael Pilato <email@example.com>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Wed Apr 4 16:11:15 2007