Re: [PROPOSAL] Change of convention for multiline string literals

On 3/18/07, Jonathan Gilbert <o2w9gs702@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> At 10:11 PM 3/10/2007 -0600, I wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I would like to propose a change to the way multiline string literals are
> >expressed, such as where the default text of a configuration file is being
> >compiled in as a single string literal.
> [snip]
> >The attached patch contains no semantic changes; it simply defines SVN_NL
> >and replaces APR_EOL_STR with it, and reformats all giant multi-line string
> >literals into a much more readable format (in my opinion, at least).
>
> Any chance of getting this patch applied? I'd much prefer to be working
> with a sane inline file string literal format for the new authz test cases.
Hi Jonathan,
I'm ready to apply this patch, but I want some arguments to align
SVN_NL to length of longest line. I prefer do not do this, because
it's easier to lost them out of screen in this case. I'll apply your
patch as is, if you give me some arguments for your approach.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org